Enlarged Erie Canal Historic District (Discontiguous)

Cohoes, Albany County, New York Listed Ref. 04000434 Historic district
Open in OpenStreetMap
Enlarged Erie Canal Historic District (Discontiguous), New York
Photo: Tsf01, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Why it's listed

Running through the City of Cohoes, this discontiguous district preserves pieces of the Enlarged Erie Canal, the widened and deepened version of the original canal built between 1836 and 1862. Five numbered units each center on surviving locks between historic Locks 9 and 18, along with berm walls, towpath, prism and a buried stone culvert. Lock 9 and Locks 14, 15 and 17 keep chamber walls and center piers built of coursed limestone ashlar. Other locks are reduced, buried beneath streets or buildings, or incorporated into later structures such as a 1966 firehouse. The canal replaced single-chamber locks with larger double-chamber locks, and engineers including Holmes Hutchinson, John Jervis and William McAlpine shaped the work in this area. The district was recognized for its role in transportation, engineering and commerce, and for the way its surviving features allow the canal's route through the city to be followed.

Machine-generated summary. This summary was generated by a language model from the official nomination document and has not been reviewed line by line by an editor. It may contain errors. Check the source document before relying on any detail. Source: nomination document (PDF) · catalog entry. Generated October 2026 (model claude-sonnet-5-5, prompt v1.0-2026-10-29).

Period of significancec. 1836-c. 1917
Areas of significanceTransportation, Engineering, Commerce
Acreage9.9
Boundary sourceNPS cultural-resource GIS polygon
Full listing pageEnlarged Erie Canal Historic District (Discontiguous) (property record)

What listing means for this property

This is a historic district. Buildings within its boundary are either contributing (they add to the district's significance) or non-contributing. Owners of contributing income-producing buildings can claim the 20% federal rehabilitation tax credit; homeowners should look at state credits. National Register districts impose no design review by themselves; a local historic district ordinance, if one exists, does (the difference explained).

General information, not legal or tax advice. Rules change; confirm with your State Historic Preservation Office or a qualified adviser.