Whitman Mills

The National Park Service has not published a boundary polygon for this district; the map shows the listed properties inside it and the district's reference point.
Why it's listed
Whitman Mills is a large textile complex on Nash's Point in New Bedford, between Riverside Avenue and the Acushnet River. Its main buildings are Mill No. 1 (1895), an office building, Mill No. 2 (1902) with a sawtooth-roofed weave shed, and several support structures, all in brick with spare Romanesque Revival detailing such as corbeled cornices and segmental-arched windows. Charles R. Makepeace of Providence designed the two mills, and Benjamin F. Smith of Pawtucket built them. The local firm Leary and Walker designed later additions in the 1920s. The mills reflect New Bedford's change from a whaling port to a center of fine cotton manufacturing, with large windows for daylight and sturdy plank-on-timber floors. Some buildings were lost in the twentieth century, and many windows have been covered or altered, yet the plant remains enormous. It was listed for its link to the city's cotton industry and its architecture, with only one weave shed still producing textiles.
Machine-generated summary. This summary was generated by a language model from the official nomination document and has not been reviewed line by line by an editor. It may contain errors. Check the source document before relying on any detail. Source: nomination document (PDF) · catalog entry. Generated October 2026 (model claude-sonnet-5-5, prompt v1.0-2026-10-29).
| Styles | Utilitarian Romanesque Revival detailing; brick, pier and masonry spandrel standard mill construction |
|---|---|
| Areas of significance | Architecture, Community Planning and Development |
| Acreage | 15.9 |
| Boundary source | not published |
| Full listing page | Whitman Mills (property record) |
What listing means for this property
This is a historic district. Buildings within its boundary are either contributing (they add to the district's significance) or non-contributing. Owners of contributing income-producing buildings can claim the 20% federal rehabilitation tax credit; homeowners should look at state credits. National Register districts impose no design review by themselves; a local historic district ordinance, if one exists, does (the difference explained).
General information, not legal or tax advice. Rules change; confirm with your State Historic Preservation Office or a qualified adviser.