Salem Common Historic District

Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts Listed Ref. 76000303 Historic district
Open in OpenStreetMap
Salem Common Historic District, Massachusetts
Photo: Fletcher6, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Why it's listed

Salem Common and the streets around it form a 76-acre district of 266 properties in eastern Salem, Massachusetts. Most are residences, set close to the street, with brick Federal mansions facing the Common. Built by merchants and sea captains, they reflect Salem's wealth from maritime trade. Two seventeenth-century houses, the Narbonne House and the Daniels House of 1667, are among the oldest buildings. Other styles include Greek Revival, Gothic Revival, Italianate, Queen Anne and Colonial Revival. The Common itself was a marshy area, was set aside as a training field in 1714, and was improved in 1801 through a subscription led by Elias Hasket Derby, with gateways by Samuel McIntire. Residents included Judge Joseph Story, philanthropist George Peabody and Nathaniel Hawthorne. The district is notable for its architectural quality, scale and cohesion, and for its large concentration of essentially unaltered buildings, which record Salem's growth and periods of prosperity.

Machine-generated summary. This summary was generated by a language model from the official nomination document and has not been reviewed line by line by an editor. It may contain errors. Check the source document before relying on any detail. Source: nomination document (PDF) · catalog entry. Generated October 2026 (model claude-sonnet-5-5, prompt v1.0-2026-10-29).

Period of significance1600-1899
StylesFederal, Greek Revival, Gothic Revival, Italianate, Second Empire, Queen Anne, Colonial Revival, with Georgian and seventeenth-century examples
Areas of significanceCommerce, Literature, Politics/Government, Architecture
Acreage76
Boundary sourceNPS cultural-resource GIS polygon
Full listing pageSalem Common Historic District (property record)

What listing means for this property

This is a historic district. Buildings within its boundary are either contributing (they add to the district's significance) or non-contributing. Owners of contributing income-producing buildings can claim the 20% federal rehabilitation tax credit; homeowners should look at state credits. National Register districts impose no design review by themselves; a local historic district ordinance, if one exists, does (the difference explained).

General information, not legal or tax advice. Rules change; confirm with your State Historic Preservation Office or a qualified adviser.