Manomet Mills

Why it's listed
Manomet Mills is a group of early 20th-century cotton mill buildings on Riverside Avenue beside the Acushnet River in New Bedford. Mill No. 1 (1903) and Mill No. 2 (1907) are each three stories and 54 bays long, built of red brick on granite foundations with segmental-arch window openings. A two-story Department Room (1907), probably used for finishing and packing goods, stands to the east. The mills produced combed cotton yarn for hosiery and underwear, largely with an immigrant workforce, during a calm period in the city's labor history. The buildings were designed by Charles R. Makepeace, working with contractor Benjamin F. Smith and manufacturer William Whitman, who developed several New Bedford mill complexes. The district represents the city's shift from whaling to textile production and survives as a well-preserved example of utilitarian Classical Revival industrial design. Later owners kept the buildings in manufacturing use until the second half of the 20th century, and they are now vacant.
Machine-generated summary. This summary was generated by a language model from the official nomination document and has not been reviewed line by line by an editor. It may contain errors. Check the source document before relying on any detail. Source: nomination document (PDF) · catalog entry. Generated October 2026 (model claude-sonnet-5-5, prompt v1.0-2026-10-29).
| Period of significance | 1903-1962 |
|---|---|
| Styles | Late 19th and Early 20th Century Revivals: Classical Revival |
| Areas of significance | Architecture, Commerce, Community Planning and Development, Industry |
| Acreage | 11.4 |
| Boundary source | NPS cultural-resource GIS polygon |
| Full listing page | Manomet Mills (property record) |
What listing means for this property
This is a historic district. Buildings within its boundary are either contributing (they add to the district's significance) or non-contributing. Owners of contributing income-producing buildings can claim the 20% federal rehabilitation tax credit; homeowners should look at state credits. National Register districts impose no design review by themselves; a local historic district ordinance, if one exists, does (the difference explained).
Noted as vacant in the nomination. Nomination documents can be decades old; current status may differ. If you are considering buying an empty listed property, read the due-diligence checklist.
General information, not legal or tax advice. Rules change; confirm with your State Historic Preservation Office or a qualified adviser.