Shadow Lawn Historic District
Why it's listed
Shadow Lawn is a compact neighborhood of single-family houses in the southeast part of Austin's Hyde Park, covering the 3800 blocks of Avenue G, Avenue H and Duval Street. Developer Monroe M. Shipe platted the Shadow Lawn Addition in 1922, though building did not begin in earnest until the late 1920s, and the busiest years were the 1930s. Most of the historic houses are one-story brick-veneer dwellings with Tudor Revival features such as steep hipped and gabled roofs, half-timbering and round-arched doorways. Three are bungalows, including the 1926 Proctor House at 3810 Duval, designed by architect Roy L. Thomas and built by Frank Rundell. City directories show that professionals owned most of the early houses, and their choice of brick contrasted with the wood cladding common nearby. Of 41 resources, 25 contribute to the district's character. The area is notable for its cohesion and for having the densest concentration of Tudor Revival homes in Austin's northern suburbs.
Significance in brief: The district is significant under Criterion C for its architecture, with the highest concentration of Tudor Revival dwellings in Austin's northern suburbs. Its brick-veneer houses used more expensive masonry than the wood-sided bungalows of nearby Hyde Park. A few Bungalow-style houses, including the Proctor House at 3810 Duval, add variety.
Machine-generated summary. This summary was generated by a language model from the official nomination document and has not been reviewed line by line by an editor. It may contain errors. Check the source document before relying on any detail. Source: nomination document (PDF) · National Archives catalog entry. NRHP reference 90001192, listed August 16, 1990. Summary generated October 2026 (model claude-sonnet-5-5, prompt v1.0-2026-10-29, confidence high).
Key facts
| Address | Roughly bounded by Ave. G, 38th St., Duval St., and 39th St., Austin |
|---|---|
| County | Travis County |
| Listed | August 16, 1990 |
| Reference number | 90001192 |
| Resource type | District |
| Period of significance | 1922 - 1941 |
| Architect / builder | unknown |
| Architectural style | Tudor Revival; Bungalow |
| Criteria |
|
| Areas of significance | Architecture |
| Level of significance | Local |
| Status (as stated in the nomination) | Houses are described as generally well maintained and in good condition, with few alterations; most still serve as single-family dwellings. |
| Acreage | 8 |
| Coordinates | 30.29984, -97.73027 (NPS GIS) |
What listing means for this property
This is a historic district. Buildings within its boundary are either contributing (they add to the district's significance) or non-contributing. Owners of contributing income-producing buildings can claim the 20% federal rehabilitation tax credit; homeowners should look at state credits. National Register districts impose no design review by themselves; a local historic district ordinance, if one exists, does (the difference explained).
General information, not legal or tax advice. Rules change; confirm with your State Historic Preservation Office or a qualified adviser.
Sources and further reading
- National Park Service, National Register of Historic Places database (snapshot May 2026), reference 90001192.
- Nomination form (PDF, National Archives) — catalog entry
- Wikipedia article (used for cross-checking only; text not reproduced here)
- Wikidata Q7460543
- This listing as JSON
Last updated October 2026. Found an error? See the editorial policy for how to report it.