Fairmount Historic District

The National Park Service has not published a boundary polygon for this district; the map shows the listed properties inside it and the district's reference point.
Why it's listed
Laid out in 1884 on a wedge of land across the Codorus Creek from York, the Fairmount neighborhood grew along North Beaver Street and three cross streets during the late 1800s and early 1900s. Developer Edward W. Spangler, a lawyer and newspaper owner, sold lots to professionals who built large single homes and duplexes, and to investors who built rental houses. Most houses combine Queen Anne, Second Empire, Gothic Revival, Colonial Revival and Italianate features in frame and brick. Its walkable location near downtown York, reached by two iron truss bridges and later served by trolley lines, drew residents across social classes. The district is considered significant for its community development as a planned suburb and for its largely intact collection of Victorian-era dwellings, which illustrate the building practices and tastes of York at the turn of the twentieth century.
Machine-generated summary. This summary was generated by a language model from the official nomination document and has not been reviewed line by line by an editor. It may contain errors. Check the source document before relying on any detail. Source: nomination document (PDF) · catalog entry. Generated October 2026 (model claude-haiku-5-5, prompt v1.1-2026-10-29).
| Period of significance | C. 1850-1933 |
|---|---|
| Styles | Queen Anne, Second Empire, Gothic Revival, Colonial Revival, Italianate |
| Areas of significance | Community Planning and Development, Architecture |
| Acreage | 0.9 |
| Boundary source | not published |
| Full listing page | Fairmount Historic District (property record) |
What listing means for this property
This is a historic district. Buildings within its boundary are either contributing (they add to the district's significance) or non-contributing. Owners of contributing income-producing buildings can claim the 20% federal rehabilitation tax credit; homeowners should look at state credits. National Register districts impose no design review by themselves; a local historic district ordinance, if one exists, does (the difference explained).
General information, not legal or tax advice. Rules change; confirm with your State Historic Preservation Office or a qualified adviser.