Marietta Historic District (Boundary Increase)

Why it's listed
Marietta's historic core lies where the Muskingum River meets the Ohio River, at the site of the first permanent settlement in the Northwest Territory. This 480-acre district expands the earlier historic district to the north and east and includes most of the original 1788 grid plat laid out by Rufus Putnam, with wide numbered streets crossed by named streets and alleys through each block. Of 2,399 resources, 2,025 contribute to its character, including commercial blocks along Front Street, churches, a post office, an armory, museums and many houses ranging from Federal and Greek Revival to Queen Anne, Foursquare and Bungalow types. Many residential streets are still brick paved and tree lined. The district was listed for its role in the city's settlement and economic growth, including the effects of major floods in 1913 and 1937, the movement of industry to the city's edges and the growth of tourism, and for its architecture. Its period of significance was extended to 1950.
Machine-generated summary. This summary was generated by a language model from the official nomination document and has not been reviewed line by line by an editor. It may contain errors. Check the source document before relying on any detail. Source: nomination document (PDF) · catalog entry. Generated October 2026 (model claude-sonnet-5-5, prompt v1.0-2026-10-29).
| Period of significance | 1788 - 1950 |
|---|---|
| Styles | Late Victorian (Italianate, Second Empire, Queen Anne), Greek Revival, Gothic Revival, Federal, Colonial Revival, Neo-Classical Revival, Art Deco, Bungalow and other styles |
| Areas of significance | Community Planning and Development, Commerce, Economics, Industry, Architecture, Other |
| Acreage | 480 |
| Boundary source | NPS cultural-resource GIS polygon |
| Full listing page | Marietta Historic District (Boundary Increase) (property record) |
What listing means for this property
This is a historic district. Buildings within its boundary are either contributing (they add to the district's significance) or non-contributing. Owners of contributing income-producing buildings can claim the 20% federal rehabilitation tax credit; homeowners should look at state credits. National Register districts impose no design review by themselves; a local historic district ordinance, if one exists, does (the difference explained).
General information, not legal or tax advice. Rules change; confirm with your State Historic Preservation Office or a qualified adviser.