Groton Leatherboard Company
The National Park Service has not published a boundary polygon for this district; the map shows the listed properties inside it and the district's reference point.
Why it's listed
This former leatherboard mill complex at 6 West Main Street in West Groton, Massachusetts, centers on a red brick mill built in 1915 and expanded with brick additions in 1926, 1928 and 1936. Shaped roughly like a lowercase "h," it sits between the Squannacook River and an abandoned Boston and Maine rail line. The buildings are plain and utilitarian, with segmental-arched windows, radiating brick voussoirs, concrete sills and tar-and-gravel roofs. Designers included Ira W. Jones, the engineers Cole and Kimball, and K.F. Kimball. The site has hosted mills since at least 1765, including saw, grist and carding mills, before a strawboard mill of about 1875 switched to leatherboard. The Groton Leatherboard Company was incorporated in 1899 by local men. Leatherboard, made from shredded leather scraps and fibers, was widely used in the shoe industry, especially for built-up heels. The complex is now vacant, and a General Electric generator remains in the motor house.
Machine-generated summary. This summary was generated by a language model from the official nomination document and has not been reviewed line by line by an editor. It may contain errors. Check the source document before relying on any detail. Source: nomination document (PDF) · catalog entry. Generated October 2026 (model claude-sonnet-5-5, prompt v1.0-2026-10-29).
| Styles | Early 20th century industrial architecture (modestly detailed, utilitarian red brick) |
|---|---|
| Areas of significance | Architecture, Community Planning and Development |
| Acreage | 8.7 |
| Boundary source | not published |
| Full listing page | Groton Leatherboard Company (property record) |
What listing means for this property
This is a historic district. Buildings within its boundary are either contributing (they add to the district's significance) or non-contributing. Owners of contributing income-producing buildings can claim the 20% federal rehabilitation tax credit; homeowners should look at state credits. National Register districts impose no design review by themselves; a local historic district ordinance, if one exists, does (the difference explained).
Noted as vacant in the nomination. Nomination documents can be decades old; current status may differ. If you are considering buying an empty listed property, read the due-diligence checklist.
General information, not legal or tax advice. Rules change; confirm with your State Historic Preservation Office or a qualified adviser.