Ruff's Mill and Concord Covered Bridge

The National Park Service has not published a boundary polygon for this district; the map shows the listed properties inside it and the district's reference point.
Why it's listed
Along Nickajack Creek in Smyrna, Georgia, a miller's house, a gristmill and a covered bridge form a small rural mill complex. The house dates from about 1850 and follows the Plantation Plain form, later given Victorian touches. The fieldstone mill is an unusual example of antebellum stone construction, since most Georgia mills were wooden. The 1872 Concord Covered Bridge, built by Martin L. Ruff and Robert Daniell, is 133 feet long with Queenpost trusses of heart-pine and iron rods. It is one of 17 covered bridges left in Georgia and one of only two with this truss type. The mill survived the Battle of Ruff's Mill on July 4, 1864, part of the Atlanta Campaign. In the 1930s landscape architect William C. Pauley laid out formal gardens and terraces behind the house for Dr. Clinton Reed. Together the buildings, waterworks remains and bridge convey how such complexes once looked and worked.
Machine-generated summary. This summary was generated by a language model from the official nomination document and has not been reviewed line by line by an editor. It may contain errors. Check the source document before relying on any detail. Source: nomination document (PDF) · catalog entry. Generated October 2026 (model claude-sonnet-5-5, prompt v1.0-2026-10-29).
| Period of significance | 1800-1899, 1900- |
|---|---|
| Styles | Plantation Plain (miller's house, with Victorian alterations); Queenpost truss covered bridge |
| Areas of significance | Industry, Landscape Architecture, Historic - Non-Aboriginal, Military, Engineering, Transportation, Architecture |
| Acreage | 3.5 |
| Boundary source | not published |
| Full listing page | Ruff's Mill and Concord Covered Bridge (property record) |
What listing means for this property
This is a historic district. Buildings within its boundary are either contributing (they add to the district's significance) or non-contributing. Owners of contributing income-producing buildings can claim the 20% federal rehabilitation tax credit; homeowners should look at state credits. National Register districts impose no design review by themselves; a local historic district ordinance, if one exists, does (the difference explained).
General information, not legal or tax advice. Rules change; confirm with your State Historic Preservation Office or a qualified adviser.