Morehead Hill Historic District (Boundary Increase)
Why it's listed
This boundary increase extends Durham's Morehead Hill neighborhood by roughly eight blocks to the west and south, taking in houses along Arnette, Vickers, Yancey, Parker and Wells streets. Most were built between about 1905 and 1955 and remain in residential use. The earliest are modest one-story Queen Anne-style tri-gable houses and pyramidal cottages, many built as speculative or rental housing. Later phases brought brick and frame bungalows, including a row of six on Vickers Avenue, along with Tudor Revival and Spanish Colonial Revival houses, Colonial Revival homes, Minimal Traditional houses and a few early Ranch houses. One Colonial Revival house on Arnette Avenue was built about 1928 for architect Thomas C. Atwood and designed by his partner Arthur C. Nash, the only house Nash designed in Durham. The district is recognized for its architecture and for showing how the neighborhood developed over about fifty years. It includes 119 contributing and 41 noncontributing resources.
Machine-generated summary. This summary was generated by a language model from the official nomination document and has not been reviewed line by line by an editor. It may contain errors. Check the source document before relying on any detail. Source: nomination document (PDF) · catalog entry. Generated October 2026 (model claude-sonnet-5-5, prompt v1.0-2026-10-29).
| Period of significance | ca. 1905 to ca. 1955 |
|---|---|
| Styles | Bungalow/Craftsman; Other: tri-gable, pyramidal cottage; Queen Anne; Colonial Revival; Tudor Revival |
| Areas of significance | Community Planning and Development, Architecture |
| Acreage | 43 |
| Boundary source | NPS cultural-resource GIS polygon |
| Full listing page | Morehead Hill Historic District (Boundary Increase) (property record) |
What listing means for this property
This is a historic district. Buildings within its boundary are either contributing (they add to the district's significance) or non-contributing. Owners of contributing income-producing buildings can claim the 20% federal rehabilitation tax credit; homeowners should look at state credits. National Register districts impose no design review by themselves; a local historic district ordinance, if one exists, does (the difference explained).
General information, not legal or tax advice. Rules change; confirm with your State Historic Preservation Office or a qualified adviser.