Southampton Village Historic District (Boundary Increase)

Why it's listed
This expansion extends Southampton Village's historic district to take in the Lewis Street neighborhood and nearby streets, including parts of Rogers Avenue, Meeting House Lane and Little Plains Road. It adds 56 contributing and 12 non-contributing buildings, bringing the district total to 430 contributing buildings. The houses are light-frame, one and one-half to two and one-half stories, and mostly sheathed in unpainted wood shingles. They reflect Colonial Revival, Shingle Style, Tudor Revival, Bungalow, American Four-Square and Queen Anne influences. Closely spaced lots, even setbacks, mature landscaping and rows of curbside trees give the streetscape a cohesive character. Development began with Lewis Street in 1900 and continued with the Rogers subdivision in 1911, making this the earliest twentieth-century neighborhood in the area. A 1909 Colonial Revival house at 227 Meeting House Lane served as the original Southampton Hospital. The area was surveyed by a local neighborhood association in 1990-91 and is significant for its architecture, with a period of significance from about 1900 to 1935.
Machine-generated summary. This summary was generated by a language model from the official nomination document and has not been reviewed line by line by an editor. It may contain errors. Check the source document before relying on any detail. Source: nomination document (PDF) · catalog entry. Generated October 2026 (model claude-sonnet-5-5, prompt v1.0-2026-10-29).
| Period of significance | ca.1900 - ca.1935 |
|---|---|
| Styles | Queen Anne, Tudor Revival, Colonial Revival, Bungalow |
| Areas of significance | Architecture |
| Acreage | 20 |
| Boundary source | NPS cultural-resource GIS polygon |
| Full listing page | Southampton Village Historic District (Boundary Increase) (property record) |
What listing means for this property
This is a historic district. Buildings within its boundary are either contributing (they add to the district's significance) or non-contributing. Owners of contributing income-producing buildings can claim the 20% federal rehabilitation tax credit; homeowners should look at state credits. National Register districts impose no design review by themselves; a local historic district ordinance, if one exists, does (the difference explained).
General information, not legal or tax advice. Rules change; confirm with your State Historic Preservation Office or a qualified adviser.