Bigelow Street Historic District

The National Park Service has not published a boundary polygon for this district; the map shows the listed properties inside it and the district's reference point.
Why it's listed
Bigelow Street in Cambridge is lined with large Mansard-roofed houses built between 1869 and 1874. Albert Vinal laid out the street in 1868 and sold most of the lots to individual housewrights and masons. No two houses are identical, yet the group looks consistent because it was built in a short period. Rooflines and setbacks are uniform and follow the incline of the street, and the houses carry abundant, high quality decorative detail. Each cost about $11,000 when new, a high price for the time. Early occupants included a leather merchant, an iron foundry owner, a government detective, a Clerk of the Courts and the treasurer of a savings bank. One later house, from 1883-84, is Queen Anne in style, and one Mansard house was moved to the street to make way for City Hall. The district covers both sides of the street between Harvard Street and Massachusetts Avenue and remains privately owned, residential and in good condition.
Machine-generated summary. This summary was generated by a language model from the official nomination document and has not been reviewed line by line by an editor. It may contain errors. Check the source document before relying on any detail. Source: nomination document (PDF) · catalog entry. Generated October 2026 (model claude-sonnet-5-5, prompt v1.0-2026-10-29).
| Period of significance | 1870-1875 |
|---|---|
| Styles | Mansard (Second Empire), with one Queen Anne house |
| Areas of significance | Architecture |
| Acreage | 3.5 |
| Boundary source | not published |
| Full listing page | Bigelow Street Historic District (property record) |
What listing means for this property
This is a historic district. Buildings within its boundary are either contributing (they add to the district's significance) or non-contributing. Owners of contributing income-producing buildings can claim the 20% federal rehabilitation tax credit; homeowners should look at state credits. National Register districts impose no design review by themselves; a local historic district ordinance, if one exists, does (the difference explained).
General information, not legal or tax advice. Rules change; confirm with your State Historic Preservation Office or a qualified adviser.