Court at 638-650 North Mar Vista Avenue

The National Park Service has not published a boundary polygon for this district; the map shows the listed properties inside it and the district's reference point.
Why it's listed
Built in 1927, this bungalow court on North Mar Vista Avenue in Pasadena is arranged in a U shape around a landscaped central courtyard. Four one-story bungalows face each other in pairs, and a rear duplex closes the end of the court. The buildings are wood-framed with clapboard siding, gabled roofs and small entry porticos supported by paired wood posts. Their simplified Colonial Revival design mixes classical touches with Craftsman details such as exposed rafters and wide eaves. Karl Valentine designed and built the court as its owner; the bungalows cost $1,500 each and the duplex $3,000. The court is significant for its site planning. Its 100-foot-wide lot allowed a spacious layout of detached houses, at a time when builders were turning to narrower courts that fit more units on a 50-foot lot. It also retains a high degree of integrity and fits well into a neighborhood of small single-family homes. It is recognized as a fine example of its type in Pasadena.
Machine-generated summary. This summary was generated by a language model from the official nomination document and has not been reviewed line by line by an editor. It may contain errors. Check the source document before relying on any detail. Source: nomination document (PDF) · catalog entry. Generated October 2026 (model claude-sonnet-5-5, prompt v1.0-2026-10-29).
| Period of significance | 1927 |
|---|---|
| Styles | Colonial Revival |
| Areas of significance | Architecture |
| Acreage | 0.9 |
| Boundary source | not published |
| Full listing page | Court at 638-650 North Mar Vista Avenue (property record) |
What listing means for this property
This is a historic district. Buildings within its boundary are either contributing (they add to the district's significance) or non-contributing. Owners of contributing income-producing buildings can claim the 20% federal rehabilitation tax credit; homeowners should look at state credits. National Register districts impose no design review by themselves; a local historic district ordinance, if one exists, does (the difference explained).
General information, not legal or tax advice. Rules change; confirm with your State Historic Preservation Office or a qualified adviser.